This trailer looks pretty good, but I just can’t get over how annoying it is that they are rebooting a franchise that gave us 3 movies in the last 10 years. The Spider-Man movies are among the biggest hits ever at the box office, why on earth start from scratch again? And in every interview they claim this is going to be so dark, like that will automatically make it better. Spider-Man isn’t Batman.
I thought this movie would be the same plot like the first one with Tobey Maguire in it. Now I see e different plot including The Lizard, so no Osborn/Green Goblin, maybe that's the only interesting part of the remake.
I've heard of reboots obviously, but a reboot this close in time to the original is disorienting. I'm not sure I want to sit through the Spiderman origin story all over again this soon.
I wouldn't necessarily call it a reboot. Consider it this way, this new Garfield is to Tobey Maguire as Roger Moore is to Sean Connery. Same characters and generally same world, just different actors.
The new film retells Spider-Man's origin (again), so it is more of a reboot than a continuation.
As for why, if the studio didn't have a SPIDER-MAN movie in production by a certain date, the rights would revert to Marvel, so they had to proceed with this film. Raimi and Maguire had simply gotten too expensive to keep on (since the success of the first three films meant they could charge more and more money for each subsequent film until it was uneconomical to make them).
It's suck that Raimi and Maguire charging more more and more when they getting more famous. But they trying to make this guy as Peter Parker...he's like a totally different person from the comics, cartoon, or last few movies. Not just his face but even his personality had changed!!! I'll be sure to get this movie from Redbox or netflix~
9 commentaires:
is that spike fron notting hill ??
to your question, the answer is : why not.
can't be as bad as the sam reimi movies.
This trailer looks pretty good, but I just can’t get over how annoying it is that they are rebooting a franchise that gave us 3 movies in the last 10 years. The Spider-Man movies are among the biggest hits ever at the box office, why on earth start from scratch again? And in every interview they claim this is going to be so dark, like that will automatically make it better. Spider-Man isn’t Batman.
I like the old spiderman rather than this one.
At first I was no but...
I thought this movie would be the same plot like the first one with Tobey Maguire in it. Now I see e different plot including The Lizard, so no Osborn/Green Goblin, maybe that's the only interesting part of the remake.
I've heard of reboots obviously, but a reboot this close in time to the original is disorienting. I'm not sure I want to sit through the Spiderman origin story all over again this soon.
I wouldn't necessarily call it a reboot. Consider it this way, this new Garfield is to Tobey Maguire as Roger Moore is to Sean Connery. Same characters and generally same world, just different actors.
The new film retells Spider-Man's origin (again), so it is more of a reboot than a continuation.
As for why, if the studio didn't have a SPIDER-MAN movie in production by a certain date, the rights would revert to Marvel, so they had to proceed with this film. Raimi and Maguire had simply gotten too expensive to keep on (since the success of the first three films meant they could charge more and more money for each subsequent film until it was uneconomical to make them).
Peter Parker looks like Norman Bates... fail
It's suck that Raimi and Maguire charging more more and more when they getting more famous. But they trying to make this guy as Peter Parker...he's like a totally different person from the comics, cartoon, or last few movies. Not just his face but even his personality had changed!!! I'll be sure to get this movie from Redbox or netflix~
Post a Comment